Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: PRAVDA can see the disaster of the PATRIOT Act?


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 04:38:02 -0500


From: "RV Head" <4whp () home com>
To: "Farber () Cis Upenn Edu" <farber () cis upenn edu>
Subject: Wow - PRAVDA can see the disaster of the PATRIOT Act?
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 23:21:05 -0500

http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/11/01/19832.html

THE TREE OF FREEDOM HAS FADED FOREVER

Mark Twain once said: "The citizen who sees his society's democratic
clothes being worn out and does not cry out is not a patriot but a
traitor." America now seems to be ready to sacrifice its liberal values for
the sake of the "victory" over terrorism.

No,it is not a script for another Hollywood thriller picturing futuristic
scenes of America's upcoming totalitarianism. All this is happening here
and now. Of late, heated debates are going on in the mass media over the
possibility of the present-day democratic society's victory over world
terrorism. The majority of the respondents arrive at the depressing
conclusion that the Western democracy is unable to tackle such a threat.
Developed 200 years ago in a different time frame and under a different
system of values, it does not seem to be able to adequately respond to
today's situation. Hence, one should make it capable of working. To do so,
one should only slash some "minor" civil rights and freedoms. Meddling with
one's private life, searches and detentions, telephone tapping, and opening
and inspecting of correspondence is just an incomplete list of rights and
freedoms to be laid on the altar of fighting terrorism. The US Congress and
Senate are ready to sign this into law at any moment. Ordinary citizens,
scared by terrorist threats, are ready to "temporarily" give up their
rights to address new challenges.

Unfortunately, they do not know that all things temporary eventually
becomes standing. The US administration explains this by saying that only
this way it can successfully counter terrorism. It may be so. An example
taken from out recent history can corroborate this. The Stalinist political
machinery operated without a hitch in the USSR. Among the arrested "spies"
and "saboteurs" were millions of innocent people. Who was guilty and who
was not? How can one find the right criterion of the selection, and who is
to conduct it?

Fighting terrorism is not a matter of one day or one year. Yet, when it is
over, the rulers will be highly tempted to leave it the way it is.

P.S. Yesterday, the French parliament was discussed measures that are
similar to those approved of in the USA. It looks like the crash of the
liberal democratic system is spreading all over the world.

DMITRI LITVINOVICH
PRAVDA.Ru

+++


For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: