Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: BABY BELL BREAKUP MOVEMENT GAINS GROUND


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:33:11 -0400



From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>

BABY BELL BREAKUP MOVEMENT GAINS GROUND
Issue: Competition

The Baby Bell local phone companies are increasingly criticized for alleged
abuse of the local phone markets. The idea of a Bell breakup has become a
rallying point for rivals and critics of the giants, who allege that Verizon
Communications, SBC Communications, BellSouth and Qwest Communications
International have abused their control of the local telephone networks. A
bill introduced by Reps. Reps. Billy Tauzin, (R-La.) and John Dingell
(D-Mich.) in Congress last week added fuel to the fire. While few expect the
bill to actually pass, its introduction is shining a light on the ongoing
criticism of some of the most powerful players in the communications
business. "The reality is that (the big local phone companies) still have a
monopoly on the wire into the home," said Gene Kimmelman, chief
telecommunications analyst for the Consumers Union. Consumer groups have
lobbied for more competition at the local level. But the breakup movement is
not a grassroots phenomenon: in the states where the issue has come up in
the past two years, AT&T has helped spearhead and fund the drive. The major
difference now is that the movement is gaining more political momentum and
credibility. Much of the political movement now is, in effect, based on
recognition that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 has failed in part.
Maureen Flood, vice president of the Competitive Telecommunications
Association, a lobbying group that represents AT&T and alternative local
phone companies said "We're taking this very seriously. There are a number
of architects of the Telecommunications Act who are really frustrated" with
the progress of local phone network competition.

[SOURCE: CNET News.com, AUTHOR: John Borland]
<http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-6818658.html?tag=tp_pr>




For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: