Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Gore on kids; Internet surveillance; more on FCC & filters


From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 16:02:45 -0400




From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>

http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/19505.html

                     Click Here for Safe Surfing
                     by Declan McCullagh 

                     3:00 a.m.  5.May.99.PDT
                     WASHINGTON -- It didn't take
                     Washington politicians very long to
                     respond to reports that the Littleton,
                     Colorado, killers had their own Web sites.
                     Last week top Justice Department official
                     Eric Holder said he'd like to see new
                     "regulations" controlling how Americans
                     use the Internet, and President Clinton
                     warned of its dangers. 

                     On Wednesday, Vice President Gore will
                     unveil the White House's latest response
                     to the shooting. 
                     [...snip...]


http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/19504.html

                     But one document distributed at the
                     event worries privacy advocates. It says
                     the money for SEC enforcement "will
                     specifically help the commission increase
                     Internet surveillance [and] augment
                     training for law enforcement." 


Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 20:56:17 -0400
To: "Colin A. Reed" <aleph () alumni caltech edu>, Declan McCullagh
<declan () well com>
From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg () epic org> 

I was there and I questioned Kennard after he spoke.

There is no doubt that the FCC Commissioner is actively promoting
filters. He began his comments on the topic by noting that
the Annenberg report released today at the National Press Club
found that only a 1/3 of parents were using filters. Kennard said
that the government should work to ensure that many more parents are
using filters. He said that the FCC is launching a web site to
provide parents with information about using filters. He also said
that he would support filters as a condition for e-rate funding for
schools and libraries.

During the Q&A, I said to Kennard that EPIC and many other
organizations had found loads of problems with filters. They
are overinclusive. They are underinclusive. They are an
imperfect solution. I suggested that at the very least the
FCC could provide links to the various reports that show
the problems with filters so that parents and others could be
more fully informed about the consequences of using these
techniques. Kennard said that this was a  "good suggestion" and
he would consider it.

Incidentally, ALA President Ann Symons gave a very good talk
at lunch. She said that the ALA opposes the use of filters
that block access to constitutionally protected speech. (Her
own library contains 60 terminals without filters. Support
the ALA.)

I spoke at the end of the day and suggested for the next
study on what parents are afraid of that the Annenberg
Center ask parents to rate the following items in terms
of how dangerous they are to their children:

  - Books
  - Computer terminals with Internet access
  - Bicycles
  - Cars
  - Motorcycles
  - Household cleaning fluids
  - Alcohol
  - Tobacco
  - Handguns

I also suggested that they ask these same parents where
their children would be most safe:

  - Behind a computer keyboard
  - Behind the steering wheel of a car
  - In a bar
  - At a rock concert
  - At a place unknown

More information at the Internet Free Expression Alliance
site (www.ifea.net).

Marc Rotenberg
EPIC.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
To subscribe: send a message to majordomo () vorlon mit edu with this text:
subscribe politech
More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: