Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Gore on kids; Internet surveillance; more on FCC & filters
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 16:02:45 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/19505.html Click Here for Safe Surfing by Declan McCullagh 3:00 a.m. 5.May.99.PDT WASHINGTON -- It didn't take Washington politicians very long to respond to reports that the Littleton, Colorado, killers had their own Web sites. Last week top Justice Department official Eric Holder said he'd like to see new "regulations" controlling how Americans use the Internet, and President Clinton warned of its dangers. On Wednesday, Vice President Gore will unveil the White House's latest response to the shooting. [...snip...] http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/19504.html But one document distributed at the event worries privacy advocates. It says the money for SEC enforcement "will specifically help the commission increase Internet surveillance [and] augment training for law enforcement." Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 20:56:17 -0400 To: "Colin A. Reed" <aleph () alumni caltech edu>, Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg () epic org> I was there and I questioned Kennard after he spoke. There is no doubt that the FCC Commissioner is actively promoting filters. He began his comments on the topic by noting that the Annenberg report released today at the National Press Club found that only a 1/3 of parents were using filters. Kennard said that the government should work to ensure that many more parents are using filters. He said that the FCC is launching a web site to provide parents with information about using filters. He also said that he would support filters as a condition for e-rate funding for schools and libraries. During the Q&A, I said to Kennard that EPIC and many other organizations had found loads of problems with filters. They are overinclusive. They are underinclusive. They are an imperfect solution. I suggested that at the very least the FCC could provide links to the various reports that show the problems with filters so that parents and others could be more fully informed about the consequences of using these techniques. Kennard said that this was a "good suggestion" and he would consider it. Incidentally, ALA President Ann Symons gave a very good talk at lunch. She said that the ALA opposes the use of filters that block access to constitutionally protected speech. (Her own library contains 60 terminals without filters. Support the ALA.) I spoke at the end of the day and suggested for the next study on what parents are afraid of that the Annenberg Center ask parents to rate the following items in terms of how dangerous they are to their children: - Books - Computer terminals with Internet access - Bicycles - Cars - Motorcycles - Household cleaning fluids - Alcohol - Tobacco - Handguns I also suggested that they ask these same parents where their children would be most safe: - Behind a computer keyboard - Behind the steering wheel of a car - In a bar - At a rock concert - At a place unknown More information at the Internet Free Expression Alliance site (www.ifea.net). Marc Rotenberg EPIC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe: send a message to majordomo () vorlon mit edu with this text: subscribe politech More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- IP: Gore on kids; Internet surveillance; more on FCC & filters Dave Farber (May 05)