Interesting People mailing list archives
The true statutory language Jamie Love complains of
From: David Farber <farber () central cis upenn edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 11:12:57 -0500
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 10:00:34 -0600 From: shaynes () research westlaw com (Steve Haynes) To: farber () central cis upenn edu Dave - Lest Jamie Love's alarmist posting lead IP's readers to conclude that the end of access to government information as we know it is imminent, I am forwarding a posting made to another list by Timothy Sprehe, a Washington consultant on access to government information, that sets forth the precise terms of the proposed statutory language, and the actual remarks of the Chairman's Draft of the "Section by Section Analysis". ---------------------Forwarded Mail----------------------------- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 09:53:15 -0500 (EST) From: J. Timothy Sprehe <jtsprehe () access2 digex net> To: James Love <love () Essential ORG> Cc: Multiple recipients of list <tap-info () essential org> Subject: Re: Help! West Publishing seeks broad change in FOIA Here is the actual language that Jamie Love's post refers to. "(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or any other law-- (1) any public information that an agency discloses, disseminates, or makes available to the public may be used by any person for profit or nonprofit activities; and (2) if any person adds value to the public information, the Federal Government shall not have any right to obtain, collect, acquire, disseminate, use, or convert -- (A) the resulting data, database, or other information product, or (B) any method used by the person to identify such resulting data, database, or information product, except under terms that are expressly agreed to by such person." The Chairman's Draft of the "Section by Section Analysis" says: "Section 3518 contains a new subsection which is intended to clarify that when public information, as defined in Section 3502, is disseminated or otherwise made available to the public, it ceases to be public information, when a person adds value to the public information. This resulting information product, including data, database, or method used to identify the data, database or information product, also ceases to be public information, and the government cannot claim a right to reacquire or use the resulting information product without the consent of the person adding value. The new subsection is designed to encourage the profit and non-profit sectors to make the widest possible use of public information released by the government." J. Timothy Sprehe Sprehe Information Management Associates, Inc. 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 507 Washington, DC 20004-1701 Phone: 202-638-4333 Fax: 202-638-2248 Internet: jtsprehe () access digex net ----------------------End Forwarded Mail------------------------- Steve
Current thread:
- The true statutory language Jamie Love complains of David Farber (Feb 09)