Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Classifying Science: A Government Proposal...1982 Bobby R. Inman [comment from Peter Freyd]
From: Mark Liberman <myl () sansom ling upenn edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 1994 14:48:52 EDT
I trust that everybody at Penn is aware that Penn has a specific policy forbidding research contracts for anything but publishable research. The policy allows a delay in publication (for patent purposes) but not prohibition. The delay, as I recall, can not be more than two years.
About seven years ago, we hired a fresh PhD from Cambridge University as a postdoc at Bell Labs. He was blocked from distributing copies of his dissertation by British Telecom, which had provided funding for his fellowship. The dissertation was duly deposited in the library at Cambridge, and could be read there by anyone who wished to make the trip, but he was enjoined (by a very threatening lawyer-letter) from giving or showing any copies to anyone, or otherwise divulging the contents. I found this strikingly at odds with what I understood the concept of a PhD dissertation to be, and inquired among various American academic colleagues. Everyone agreed that such an arrangement would never be tolerated at a respectable American university. I believe that Cambridge was also somewhat concerned (I gather that they may not have scrutinized the agreement with BT very carefully when it was instituted), and afterwards instituted an arrangement rather like Penn's, where a modest but fixed delay for patent purposes was permitted. Would Penn's policies ever have permitted a classified PhD dissertation? Or one that could not be distributed because it was the intellectual proprty of some company providing the fellowship money? Mark Liberman myl () unagi cis upenn edu 619 Williams Hall University of Pennsylvania Phone: 215-898-0141 Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 Fax: 215-573-2175
Current thread:
- Re: Classifying Science: A Government Proposal...1982 Bobby R. Inman [comment from Peter Freyd] Mark Liberman (Apr 18)