Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: apache problem
From: Stephen Smoogen <smoogen () lanl gov>
Date: 18 Oct 2002 07:37:24 -0600
With the release of a new series, they usually officially stop support the earlier of the previous release. When 7.0 came out 6.1 and 6.0 were no longer supported. I think that within a couple months, we will see a 'silent' dropping of 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2 in favor of just 7.3 security errata. On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:28, Jason Giglio wrote:
On 17 Oct 2002 14:02:53 -0600 Stephen Smoogen <smoogen () lanl gov> wrote:Here is how I understand it: Red Hat supports 3 versions of their boxed OS with security fixes at this time: Red Hat Linux 6.2, Red Hat Linux 7.3, and Red Hat Linux 8.0. They will do security fixes which would be to apache-1.3.2? for 6.2 and 7.3 and for 8.0 it would be 2.x.This is incorrect, they support 6.2, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0.
-- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen () lanl gov Los Alamos National Labrador CCN-2 B-Schedule PH: Ta-03 SM-261 MailStop P208 DP 17U Los Alamos, NM 87545 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Re: apache problem, (continued)
- Re: apache problem Bob Johnson (Oct 16)
- Re: apache problem SZALAY Attila (Oct 15)
- Re: apache problem cory (Oct 15)
- Re: apache problem Bob Johnson (Oct 16)
- Re: apache problem Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 15)
- Re: apache problem Homer Wilson Smith (Oct 16)
- Re: apache problem Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 16)
- Re: apache problem Stephen Smoogen (Oct 17)
- RE: apache problem Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Oct 18)
- Re: apache problem Jason Giglio (Oct 18)
- Re: apache problem Stephen Smoogen (Oct 18)
- RE: apache problem Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Oct 18)
- Re: apache problem Homer Wilson Smith (Oct 16)