Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Port 113 requests?
From: Alexander Bochmann <securityfocus-incidents () freinet de>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:42:35 +0100
...on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:51:33PM -0700, Slighter, Tim wrote:
you really should try and specify that the rule "drops" instead of reject so that the potential intruder is not provided with any information about their attempted connection.
...except that Ryan Russell just explained why this is a bad idea (at least if you want to send mail from that machine). Alex. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- RE: Port 113 requests?, (continued)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Ryan McDonnell (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Andrew Leonard (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Todd Suiter (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Helmut Springer (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Crist J . Clark (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Greg A. Woods (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Paul Cardon (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Mike Meredith (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Tony Gale (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Florian Weimer (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Alexander Bochmann (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Patrick Patterson (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Paul Gear (Dec 07)
- Thread "Port 113 requests?" Mario van Velzen (Dec 07)
- Re: Port 113 requests? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 09)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Chris Keladis (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Jose Nazario (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Steve Stearns (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Jose Nazario (Dec 07)
- RE: Port 113 requests? Brian Cervenka (Dec 07)