Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: No one wants responsibility

From: Terje Bless <link () TSS NO>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 20:42:01 +0200

On 19.09.00 at 13:36, UnixGeek <ed () XWING CENTIGRAM COM> wrote:

ORBS n' RBL essentially do this to mail services.  Why not just carry the
blacklisting a bit farther?


YM IDP aka. Internet Death Penalty. One of the spambones (Spam Backbone
ISP) got this once as I recall, from a limited number of nets, but that's
about all AFAIC. Unless you get the cooperation of their upstream it's damn
neigh impossible and if you have that cooperation it's very likely that a
less "Ultimate Solution" can be worked out. Pressure from their upstreams
is likely to get their attention.

Current thread:

No one wants responsibility Harlan S. Barney, Jr. (Sep 19)
- Re: No one wants responsibility UnixGeek (Sep 20)
  - Re: No one wants responsibility Terje Bless (Sep 21)
- A port scan is not an Incident (was No one wants responsibility) Etaoin Shrdlu (Sep 20)
  - Re: A port scan is not an Incident (was No one wants responsibility) Rob McCauley (Sep 21)
  - Re: A port scan is not an Incident (was No one wants responsibility) David Brumley (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: No one wants responsibility Guilherme Mesquita (Sep 20)
- Re: No one wants responsibility Paul Franson (Sep 20)
- Re: No one wants responsibility Craven, William (Sep 20)
- Re: No one wants responsibility Laumann, Dave (Sep 21)