Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: 169.254.x.x


From: peak () ARGO TROJA MFF CUNI CZ (Pavel Kankovsky)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:04:20 +0200


On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Robert Graham wrote:

...For example, on a widely switched Ethernet backbone, it could
enable the user to at least e-mail MIS saying that their network
connection is flaky.

1. they would not send anything unless a SMTP server listens on
   169.254.0.0/16 locally and they can locate and use it, in a
   clueless-user-friendly way
2. if "their network connection is flaky", it is quite unlikely DHCP is
   the only thing that will fail
3. if they are able to send packets at all, whoever monitoring the network
   will already know something is wrong because repeated DHCP requests
   from a single host will be seen

--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak  [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."


Current thread: