Honeypots mailing list archives
RE: Virtual Honeypot Users
From: "Freddie Beaver" <frebea44 () earthlink net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:20:23 -0400
You mean people actually deploy homeypots (virtual or not) and don't simulate traffic?? :-) I usually will stop at the store that has a full parking lot. A comparison can be made with the success of a certain large, department store chain. Build a huge store with everything in it, sale cheap, hire cheap, and let its convenience and size draw customers and run small competitors out of business. Things that make you go hummmm... Fred -----Original Message----- From: Brian Burton [mailto:brianburton () telus net] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:05 PM To: honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: Virtual Honeypot Users I've been thinking about this lately and wonder what others think... Basically do you think it would be worth it to simulate actual users logging in and doing tasks on honeypots? I know you'd then have additional activity on the honeypot you'd have to account for but just thought this would be an interesting addition for them making them more realistic. I thought of it since when hackers do get into the box they for sure check if anyone is logged on and I'd assume it always seem odd if no one is ever logged in or anything additional has happened since the previous time they've been on. I'm sure others have thought of this or something similar so was curious on what you think about doing this. Brian
Current thread:
- Virtual Honeypot Users Brian Burton (Jun 14)
- RE: Virtual Honeypot Users Freddie Beaver (Jun 15)
- Re: Virtual Honeypot Users Andrew R. Lamb (Jun 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re:Virtual Honeypot Users Vlad (Jun 15)