Re: Japan's nuclear "disaster"

[Colin Keigher <colin () afreak ca>]

If they were positive coefficient reactors, I'd have something to say 
about them being a danger. However, being that they're negative 
coefficient, keep calm and carry on.

Now, coal plants on the other hand...

- Colin

On 3/13/11 12:29 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
> A very complete and in-depth examination of the shut-down, venting, and
> controls systems at Fukushima.  Not only interesting in view of the media furor,
> but a great case of defence in depth:
>
> http://morgsatlarge.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/why-i-am-not-worried-about-
> japans-nuclear-reactors/
>
> (Fairly long piece, so I guess iPad users will never finish it  :-)
>
> ======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
> rslade () vcn bc ca     slade () victoria tc ca     rslade () computercrime org
> It's sad that the signal/noise ratio of the Internet is now
> asymptotically approaching zero because 90% of traffic is SPAM
> and the remaining 10% is stupid and offensive email disclaimers.
> It will actually go negative as soon as spammers decide that they
> need long and discursive disclaimers in order to make their stuff
> look authentic.                 - Les Bell 20090130, message #118685
> victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links
> http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
> http://twitter.com/rslade
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.