Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!

[Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>]

A few days ago a story broke where someone hacked into a global warming 
research institute and stole all emails from the past 10 years, proving 
a conspiracy.

In the vast amount of emails stolen, some emails were also found with 
clear-cut lies, showing how some scientists conspired to deceive in 
scientific research about data that did not fit their agenda of proving 
global warming.

Join the debate mailing list, now! :)
http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/debate

I am opening the subject for debate on the debate mailing list. It is a 
fascinating topic covering several subjects such as 'does the end 
justify the means?', 'irresponsible disclosure of personal data', 'is it 
justifiable to break the law?' and 'civil disobedience and the hackers' 
role in keeping society honest'.

Here are some possible questions to get the wheels rolling:

- Is the action taken by the hacker legal, ethical, and/or moral? Was 
the action justifiable?

- Do you believe the harm done as a result is justified for the good 
(disclosure) that came out of it?

- Can this be treated as civil disobedience?

For background, check out this story
http://www.examiner.com/x-25061-Climate-Change-Examiner~y2009m11d20-ClimateGate--Climate-centers-server-hacked-revealing-documents-and-emails
If URL breaks:
http://tinyurl.com/yceb9tw

Another source:
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/leaked-foia-files-62-mb-of-gold/

Join the debate mailing list, now! :)
http://whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/debate

Please state your opinions openly, and let's discuss!

        Gadi.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.