Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review

[chris () blask org]

--- On Sat, 11/14/09, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:

> Is it me or is the new Whitehouse cyber security document just b/s of 
> more cooperation yet again?

I'm not sure what level of specificity you might be expecting in such a document.  If this said "and everyone will use 
WPA2 Enterprise" I'd be much more concerned that someone in DC was smoking the bad crack.

On a quick scan it contains reasonable cat-herding terminology all-in-all.  Develop vision, strategy, coordination.  
Integrate agency activities, enhance incentives for development of secure products in private industry, encourage 
identity solutions while considering privacy and civil liberties.  

Yada.

It's a big ocean that needs to be boiled without making the frog jump out (and similar appropriately vague analogies).

Lemme study this thing more and I'll let you know what I really think of it.

-chris


      
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.