funsec mailing list archives
Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails
From: Paul M Moriarty <pmm () igtc com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:24:18 -0800
Right. But that's usually decided by a judge. My opinion? They were complicit. On Dec 17, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Larry Seltzer wrote:
Maybe? Meaning they haven't proven to you that they weren't complicit? That's not how evidence works. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Gadi Evron (Dec 16)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul Ferguson (Dec 16)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Larry Seltzer (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Larry Seltzer (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Larry Seltzer (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Paul M Moriarty (Dec 17)
- Re: The Legality of Publishing Hacked E-Mails Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 17)