funsec mailing list archives

Re: Any ideas?

From: David M Chess <chess () us ibm com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:26:11 -0400

Les Bell:

Yes indeed. Geolocation inside network 10 would be an achievement, if it
could be done at all. It mostly depends on CIDR, which came long after
those early address allocations.


Haha!  Yeah, it would be right up there with geolocation inside 
172.[16-31], or within 192.168.  Would require more than just CIDR 
understanding, would require maybe a gypsy fortune-teller.

Does anybody attempt to do geolocation inside network 9, for example -
which is IBM? I doubt anyone ever sees those addresses on the Connected
Internet.


Seems unlikely; even if those addresses did get exposed here and there, 
the address-to-location map is presumably both closely-held and 
rapidly-changing.

DC

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Current thread:

Any ideas? Richard Golodner (Apr 03)
- Re: Any ideas? Robert Graham (Apr 03)
  - Re: Any ideas? Richard Golodner (Apr 03)
    - Re: Any ideas? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
    - Re: Any ideas? Richard Golodner (Apr 04)
    - Re: Any ideas? Robert Graham (Apr 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Any ideas? Les Bell (Apr 04)
  - Re: Any ideas? Donal (Apr 04)
- Re: Any ideas? Les Bell (Apr 04)
  - Re: Any ideas? David M Chess (Apr 06)
    - Re: Any ideas? Gadi Evron (Apr 06)