funsec mailing list archives
Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11'
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:25:16 -0500
On Dec 22, 2008, at 2:04 AM, der Mouse wrote:
You'll pardon me if I see a slight difference of magnitude between sending a plane full of a hundred or so innocent people careening into an office building of many thousands at 500 miles per hour as slightly more important than cooking a transformer.And when downing the transformer - or, more likely, transformer*s* - takes out power to a couple of middling-large cities for several weeks in the dead of winter? Say, several million people, of which a few percent, at least, are marginal enough to be killed outright by it, and
... and not to mention the fires that crop up when power is restored... _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11', (continued)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' David Harley (Dec 19)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' Jon Kibler (Dec 19)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP (Dec 20)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' Jon Kibler (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' David Harley (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' John Bambenek (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP (Dec 20)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' John Bambenek (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' der Mouse (Dec 21)
- Re: US 'unprepared for cyber 9/11' John Payne (Dec 22)