funsec mailing list archives
Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News
From: silky <michaelslists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:21:20 +1100
On 11/13/07, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 8:11 PM, silky <michaelslists () gmail com> wrote:let's also not forget that ad's themselves are viral in nature. tricking us into trusting the products they promote so that they can exploit our wallets ...OMG - haven't you left a tree defenseless or did you manage 'Net access in the canopy?!
hahahahaha. -- mike http://lets.coozi.com.au/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News, (continued)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Dude VanWinkle (Nov 12)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Larry Seltzer (Nov 12)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Alex Eckelberry (Nov 12)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Larry Seltzer (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Brian Loe (Nov 12)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 12)
- A recent candidate to the Darwin Award Remo Cornali (Nov 13)
- Re: A recent candidate to the Darwin Award Brian Loe (Nov 13)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Gadi Evron (Nov 13)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 13)
- RE: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News Adam Thomas (Nov 13)
- Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News silky (Nov 13)