Re: Some Ad Networks Are Bad News

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On Nov 12, 2007 9:43 PM, silky <michaelslists () gmail com> wrote:
> On 11/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, silky <michaelslists () gmail com> wrote:
> > > is this really news?
> >
> > No, but if doubleclick is messing up then well we are kinda screwed. I
> > just thought it was funny, even if unavoidable :-)
> >
> > On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, silky <michaelslists () gmail com> also wrote:
> > > orly?
> > On Nov 12, 2007 9:11 PM, Dude <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> didn't get it <whoosh!>:
> >
> >
> > > let's also not forget that ad's themselves are viral in nature.
> > > tricking us into trusting the products they promote so that they can
> > > exploit our wallets ...
> >
> > Ahh the benefits of applied psychology: It only works on the weak of mind..
>
> sadly the weak of mind have the same voting rights as the rest of us;
> if not the majority vote.

But they are easy to control, so we have no excuses for being beaten
by two parties of morons..

-JP
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.