Re: While we're talking about the 1st amendment...

[Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>]

Google actually has a court loss to back this up:
http://www.news.com/2100-1030_3-5564118.html

                                        BB

Larry Seltzer wrote:
> http://www.examiner.com/a-983100~Robert_Cox__Google_bans_anti_MoveOn_org_ads.html
>  
> <excerpt>
>     Internet giant Google has banned advertisements critical of
> MoveOn.org, the far-left advocacy group that caused a national uproar
> last month when it received preferential treatment from The New York
> Times for its “General Betray Us” message.
>
>     The ads banned by Google were placed by a firm working for
> Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ re-election campaign. Collins is seeking
> her third term.
>
>     Earlier this week, Google told Lance Dutson, president of Maine
> Coast Designs, that the ads he placed for Collins had been removed and
> would not be allowed to resume because they violated Google’s trademark
> policy.
>
>     Google’s Web site states, “Google takes allegations of trademark
> infringement very seriously and, as a courtesy, we’re happy to
> investigate matters raised by trademark owners.” That suggests Google
> acted in response to a complaint by MoveOn.org.
> </excerpt>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.