Re: too beautiful not to share

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:52:28 PDT, Blue Boar said:

> Assuming that selling them is wrong, and that using them to kill is
> wrong, then 1 weapon that kills 1,000 is worse, unless the owner is also
> 1000 times less likely to use that one big weapon than the small weapons.

Given the number of AK-47s in the world, and the number that get used, and the
number of people killed in said usages, and the number of nuclear warheads in
the world, and the number that have been used, it's obvious that over the last
50 years, more people have been killed by AK-47s and similar than by nuclear
warheads.  So morally, it's far from "obvious" that a WMD is automatically
"worse"....

> Or was that supposed to be rhetorical?

Yes.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.