Re: Intel gets into AV?

["Nervox Nervox" <nervox.nosecurity () gmail com>]

> virtualization technology—which can partition a PC to run different
> types of software simultaneously—to set up a new type of security
> checkpoint inside each machine. That checkpoint, which is expected to
> be the first of its kind for client PCs when it arrives in vPro

Wouldn't slow down the Pc in general?

> monitoring network traffic into it and intervening if it exhibits
> behavior patterns consistent with an infection. "We had to come up

Privacy ?Or every one forgot about that? Lets say it can be stired the
other way around , an expoit that can lead to some sniffing you're
traffic without any need of an OS exploit.

Also wouldn't each ship/system/whatever have a guid ?Wouldn't that
make a person tracable and some one somewhere would be able to follow
you/know where you are at any moment (specially if they get on this
with windows).

> with some better, more proactive, more intelligent [and] more
> automated ways to defend our systems," said Gregory Bryant, general

Intelligent right .... if they have said a couple of more buzz word i
would have bought it!! I don't know they could have said :" now with a
super duper Neurel Net " or a "New Age fuzzy machine thingy wingy" .

> This cant turn out well IMO
>
> -JP

I think it is going to turn into Poupou IMHO

Best Regards Nervox

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.