funsec mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch
From: Barrie Dempster <barrie () reboot-robot net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:34:37 +0000
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:15 +0000, Fergie wrote:
Not sure I like how this story is worded. I mean, I realize that MS won't exactly endorse it, but WTF...
What specifically don't you like about it ? MS say they can not endorse it and advise their users to beware. Very responsible advice and exactly what I would expect. -- With Regards.. Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue "He who hingeth aboot, geteth hee-haw" Victor - Still Game blog: http://reboot-robot.net sites: http://www.bsrf.org.uk - http://www.security-forums.com ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Fergie (Jan 03)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Barrie Dempster (Jan 03)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 03)
- RE: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary'patch Randy Abrams (Jan 06)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary'patch Gadi Evron (Jan 06)
- RE: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary'patch Randy Abrams (Jan 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Jan 03)
- Re: Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' patch Florian Weimer (Jan 03)