funsec mailing list archives
Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea
From: Matthew Murphy <mattmurphy () kc rr com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:49:00 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dude VanWinkle wrote:
Nice, but kind of a round about method. My religion goes straight to the point. Our beliefs? We believe that in order to be closer to god, we have to counterfeit money as close to the original as possible. It all stemmed from the "in god we trust" motto found inscribed on all US currency.
This is getting way out of hand. What surprises me is that nobody has hit on the *REALLY* interesting part of this ruling. Courts have consistently ruled against the government in this case on the basis that uniform enforcement of drug laws is not a "compelling interest" of the government in suppressing religious freedom. In other words: the drug laws, which have no basis for a "compelling interest" of societal protection are unconstitutional on-face for the simple reason that they infringe upon freedom of expression for no demonstrated purpose. If American drug policy had some hope of being effective and an effective American drug policy was actually of some provable benefit to the society as a whole, the court's ruling would've been different. This ruling is a factual finding of what most of America has known for years: that U.S. drug-control law is not only ineffective but counter-productive. For once, the people on the federal benches seem to have some sense... now if only they had that in common with the legislature and executive, we'd be living in a much better world. - -- "Social Darwinism: Try to make something idiot-proof, nature will provide you with a better idiot." -- Michael Holstein -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB5444D38 iD8DBQFD/8Wcfp4vUrVETTgRAxiQAJ9OAzgMIRL7hbl23ICkjzUtUcdSWgCdF6y0 aMogN53sKkW70RXaCp840N4= =wi0/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Fergie (Feb 21)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Ron (Feb 24)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 24)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Dude VanWinkle (Feb 24)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Matthew Murphy (Feb 24)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Troy Solo (Feb 25)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 24)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Ron (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Blanchard_Michael (Feb 21)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Dude VanWinkle (Feb 21)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 21)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Blue Boar (Feb 21)
- Re: Court Upholds Church Use of Hallucinogenic Tea Dude VanWinkle (Feb 21)