funsec mailing list archives
Re[2]: Federal agents' visit was a hoax
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:27:14 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Pierre Vandevenne wrote:
Good Evening, Friday, December 30, 2005, 2:20:48 AM, you wrote: DL> Given how easily this lie was slurped up and regurgitated by the media, DL> I wonder how much of the basis for believing it was "plausible" is also DL> just as baseless. I guess this just means you guys must work harder on your marketing, worldwide, but locally as well. Another hypothesis, given the utterly laughable analysis of the French riots and/or IT security issues offered by the same medias, is that there really is a fundamental problem with medias today.
Anyone with involvement in computer security has known that for many years; the difference between what the media says and what we know to be the situation is so huge - did you think that this applied to only one field? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax, (continued)
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Anthony Rodgers (Dec 29)
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Paul Schmehl (Dec 29)
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Paul Schmehl (Dec 29)
- Re: Federal agents' visit was a hoax David LaPorte (Dec 29)
- Re[2]: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Pierre Vandevenne (Dec 29)
- Re: Re[2]: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Paul Schmehl (Dec 29)
- Re[2]: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Drsolly (Dec 30)
- Re[3]: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Pierre Vandevenne (Dec 30)
- Re: Re[2]: Federal agents' visit was a hoax Paul Schmehl (Dec 30)