funsec mailing list archives
Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:57:28 -0700
Aviram Jenik wrote:
See, this is what I don't get. I can understand the bored people (sorry Gadi) who want to log and monitor who attacks them and why. I _can't_ understand the busy people who are actually protecting their network, spending their time and money on silly IDS solutions.
So after you have had a successful intrusion, you really really wish that you had some logs to help tell you what happened. An IDS can provide some of those. Ideally, one closer to the original concept of NFR.
Or perhaps you work for a group that requires investigating all attempts, and it becomes a survival technique to reduce those as much as possible. ;)
Ryan _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Gadi Evron (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Jordan Wiens (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Aviram Jenik (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Blue Boar (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Roland Dobbins (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Aviram Jenik (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Jordan Wiens (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Blue Boar (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Blue Boar (Oct 12)
- Message not available
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 13)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Robert Edmonds (Oct 20)