funsec mailing list archives
Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible?
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:49:35 -0800
Gadi Evron wrote:
While I certainly did not dispute the facts that David Litchfield showed of Oracle's behaviour, I did not agree with how he did it or that Oracle is alone.
I didn't see that mentioned. What did Dave do wrong? BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 12)
- oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 12)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? RLVaughn (Dec 12)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 12)
- RE: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 12)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? RLVaughn (Dec 12)