Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

[Źmicier Januszkiewicz <gauri () tut by>]

Especially considering that all three use Tor to post on the list. I wonder why.
Other header/content details can be interesting as well...


2014-03-17 10:24 GMT+01:00 Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib () gmail com>:
> On 16 Mar 2014 23:36, "T Imbrahim" <TImbrahim () techemail com> wrote:
> > The thread read Google vulnerabilities with PoC. From my understanding  it
> > was a RFI vulnerability on YouTube, and I voiced my support that this is a
> > vulnerability.
> >
> > I also explained a JSON Hijacking case as a follow up, and you said you
> > didn't follow.  So I am just saying that treating security that way, there
> > are other parties like NSA who welcome them happily.
>
> I think these guys - Alfred, Kirschbaum and Imbrahim are the OP's sock
> puppets.
>
> They are all first time posters from unusual free email providers jumping to
> defend the OP out of nowhere. If you search Google for their emails you only
> find references to this thread.
>
> They present similar (false and /or incorrect) arguments, talk about their
> extensive work experience, bash Google and its security team and send
> repeated emails with exactly the same text.
>
> This is turning into a madhouse... I hope this guy doesn't have access to a
> gun.
>
> Regards
> Pedro
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/