Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: A question for the list - WordPress plugin inspections


From: Harry Metcalfe <harry () dxw com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:58:49 +0000

Hi Seth,

There really isn't time for us to do that, in the context of an inspection. It's a very light-touch assessment.

When we find vulnerabilities we do also report those, after working with the vendor. And they are more detailed. For example:

https://security.dxw.com/advisories/moving-any-file-php-user-has-access-to-in-bp-group-documents-1-2-1/

Harry

On 19/02/2014 19:27, Seth Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:40:51PM +0000, Harry Metcalfe wrote:
We write and publish light-touch inspections of WordPress plugins
that we do for our clients. They are just a guide - we conduct some
basic checks, not a thorough review.

Would plugins which fail this inspection be of general interest to
the list and therefore worth posting, as we would a vulnerability?

Here's an example report:

   https://security.dxw.com/plugins/gd-star-rating-1-9-22/

Grateful for a steer...
That's a very nice summary view, but it'd be more useful in this medium
if you included the lines of code that introduce the vulnerabilities.

Most useful would be to coordinate with authors and MITRE for CVE numbers
for the issues you find to ensure the issues aren't forgotten about or
otherwise ignored.

Thanks


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: