Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Legality of Open Source Tools
From: Daniel Wood <daniel.wood () owasp org>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 17:55:36 -0400
Toni, The English version has this information in Chapter 38, I didn't find it in a Chapter 34. The key to all this is the language of intent, using verbiage such as "aggravated", "unlawful", and "to cause detriment". This is the same as the United States and many other countries; if you don't have the intention to cause harm, it can be argued as a lack of 'mens rea' which is Latin for "guilty mind". In order for it to be considered a crime (legally speaking at least in the United States) you need that key component with the actual act of committing the crime (known as 'actus reus'). I'm not saying that Finland or any other country is the same as the United States, but having studied Criminal Law, I do know that many countries have similar code on the books. If you're truly concerned, I would write or speak to your court representative for clarification. Daniel
On Apr 5, 2014, at 6:23 AM, Toni Korpela <admin () xorfork com> wrote: Greetings from Finland. I know that here it is illegal to import, manufacture, sell or otherwise distribute such machine or software which are designed to endanger or harm information and communication systems. This is stated in chapter 34 § 9a. Then again § 9b states that it is illegal to posess machine, software and access information into systems which you can use to endanger or harm information and communication systems. Basically this means that I am not allowed to have ping, nmap or other networking / penetration testing tools which can be used for harm installed on my computer. Though I am not certain if any of these computer security laws have been used to penalize someone. I am not certain if penetration testing tools belong to the category of tools which are designed to endanger or harm information and communication systems. It's quite harsh if I could get fines or maximum of 2 years jail for having Linux distribution with some networking tools installed on my computer. -Toni _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Current thread:
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools, (continued)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Andres Riancho (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Andres Riancho (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Ryan Dewhurst (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Volker Tanger (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 05)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 05)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Henri Salo (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Jeffrey Walton (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Daniel Wood (Apr 07)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Andres Riancho (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Not EcksKaySeeDee (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Brunner, Mark (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools John Young (Apr 05)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools coderman (Apr 06)