Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Legality of Open Source Tools
From: Not EcksKaySeeDee <noteckskayseedee () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:05:44 -0400
True, s/ware is different from a gun. I mostly meant it tongue in cheek. But I can't help but wonder, what with the increase of people learning to code (mind you, there's a diff between hobby and serious, I accept that), and the whole Internet of Things, and the fact that most modern hardware (nuclear reactor, medical, automotive, aeronautical...) relies on code underneath of some form or fashion, that code has the potential to kill. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andres Riancho <andres.riancho () gmail com>wrote:
Software is SO different to a gun... you can't really compare them. Real people will die in most cases when a gun is misused, only electrons are disturbed (in the great majority of cases) if you misuse a hacking tool. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Not EcksKaySeeDee <noteckskayseedee () gmail com> wrote:Re: Use of a disclaimer on these sort of tools (i.e., those that can harm and/or be used for good). Wonder if any gun dealer applied something similar in their shop, or for that matter, in a hardware store under the hammer section. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Andres Riancho <andres.riancho () gmail com wrote:Hi. As w3af's project leader I've not received any legal threats over the seven years this project has been alive. Only a couple of months ago, and just to be sure, I added this disclaimer which users need to accept to run the tool. DISCLAIMER = """Usage of w3af for sending any traffic to a target without prior mutual consent is illegal. It is the end user's responsibility to obey all applicable local, state and federal laws. Developers assume no liability and are not responsible for any misuse or damage caused by this program.""" On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Bryan Bickford <bryan () unhwildhats com> wrote:Greetings I am a security researcher who is working on a project in my freetime,without going into details - the project will end with a powerful tool being publicly released. Obviously most cyber security tools have the potential for abuse. What sort of legal hurdles (if any) do you need to overcome to protect yourself when releasing software along the lines of metasploit? _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/-- Andrés Riancho Project Leader at w3af - http://w3af.org/ Web Application Attack and Audit Framework Twitter: @w3af GPG: 0x93C344F3 _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/-- Andrés Riancho Project Leader at w3af - http://w3af.org/ Web Application Attack and Audit Framework Twitter: @w3af GPG: 0x93C344F3
_______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Current thread:
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Andres Riancho (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Ryan Dewhurst (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Volker Tanger (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 05)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 05)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Henri Salo (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Jeffrey Walton (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Toni Korpela (Apr 06)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Daniel Wood (Apr 07)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Not EcksKaySeeDee (Apr 04)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools Brunner, Mark (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools John Young (Apr 05)
- Re: Legality of Open Source Tools coderman (Apr 06)