Re: heartbleed OpenSSL bug CVE-2014-0160

[Jeremy Voorhis <jvoorhis () gmail com>]

I just read an article titled "Why heartbleed doesn't leak the private key"
and the claim seems irresponsible and overly broad. Can anyone comment on
his analysis?

http://blog.erratasec.com/2014/04/why-heartbleed-doesnt-leak-private-key.html#.U0WjNK1dWBg


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kirils Solovjovs <
kirils.solovjovs () kirils com> wrote:

> We are doomed.
>
> Description: http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
> Article dedicated to the bug: http://heartbleed.com/
> Tool to check if TLS heartbeat extension is supported:
> http://possible.lv/tools/hb/
>
> A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension
> can be used to reveal up to 64kB of memory to a connected client or server.
>
> 1.0.1[ abcdef] affected.
>
>
> P.S. Happy Monday!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/



-- 
Jeremy Voorhis

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/