Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

[Pedro Worcel <pedro () worcel com>]

When you import the public key it says this:

hidden@dot.onion ("born on January 31 1979 .. all prime numbers .. I would
sit on the floor in my bedroom and just count.")

My guess is that you need those three primes (1 31 1979?) you can somehow
generate the public key for the hidden service where the mail address is. I
tried to determine how onion addresses are generated but unfortunately I am
a noob and I couldn't do it.


2013/11/2 Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey () goldmark org>

> On 2013-10-31, at 11:11 PM, coderman <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
> > > my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of
> provider.
> > > there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
> > > agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
> > > email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
> > > bug...  "you must be this high to ride..."
> >
> >
> > still no successful encrypted responses.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> hQMOAyheCGO7e/dQEAv+MonJWg7wyFrbCTJrQ7k4TeG6ue99TGvhZVXouiNS3o4e
> joZKdq6G7DcnkBrOWbqr6dGoqPUk07HxD4SpxyNV/mm0ns0EjmPiS5AecYAu7Pul
> YSY2LG7feo5gJdbCheb4l6WqEr+w2/3m14TePwH6pX31l9qaBiWJdpgDBymMVDPA
> 0mx8AyKp5Evwa1P+R3DVn8P8wQJYbtlhCBlgMwyfQMGnoxRuiivhjxT3gL6PcKQY
> Zt1S7QTR0QTq45GxNfSuzeZpf/VdsYX1EffHkeDwMV4pzqSaSBOnY5/L+uv/ZI7G
> x8pBB85xeM7C4NqjdH0fhm9aKeTh6lhn2Ano5xx04HHmj/tCwNPtsH7gChkBs9ud
> qe8NZmBj+RfKMzwUoSbYxdCLAbc8jziSeweOl9nehgmtfVFCUiEZRi9rt6K2kpll
> luhGSH7OnXrm+SgTLX8MQc7W+O0ZuOJhkuHabcgl+X5Ig0XiO04FHFwdhXTC3vIz
> n8YX/vufZSCDu3lsVXhbDACUIoqGEwwY8wJkxCy5NDZpK+r3D+j5jiEzzNdJ8gGH
> ki9MEIBtD0vfxmjEeeHuTrIKBQPeWygFB8n+sTUw76rx77Fe7b+VvM7YGIpfXf99
> IUuVbDt9XYG6Xw+pLEn+l7OEPKkuJVvyew72oWUEIErH9afAs+/LRp/GFu2QN/DK
> 3/Tx+/5SFnzVraYEOWDIYrWB8WCEt9+m8tvl05kU/NNW/yRCOnu454LMp1jBzahd
> 9/Et37Ak1qKJabBL4iw1p/M8RYHbO5K8083XvS6rGc5M6k0iYyKIwmdfeq8+S/+h
> x4eZiBCxoE1aMXG3qPZqRl/Z/awJj7cT2YzhX67cVz5DrJJzVUefs6zyclMbBnON
> ahCpB4D8ll7jy7Iq8cP3v9d+xp+JAqErEIyrdxHrbWwIf+ogKgMwK9H6D7WYyIji
> lhbTWeUvptooCILO108vRgtxkHMIZ/bpeRjhsIwgqER3C0G+3QYveAlxtqZ8HrQN
> ZH269bJiVmFTH6GBSMtJTEOFAg4DZhibeqJD/S4QB/9hZut5POE/6gWRV9YmJd8G
> jjEjbxxhgMZVm4KJDhoMS/b3/UZbdnlx9G6WHech6u/SEI3QQ+fqC8AUIWZfmPZw
> r+4y71J42TKBuATwAoyw9ooA66aFP+M2bWYehurBhbU00dT+6bxq74ggfJaFgn7v
> b6Cr6cgODrNlmnxK4Ly95qwHgA5Yt+bbtANhbo/G8W17i6uFxvABu+t+38n6wQPH
> XXDspJVpcW8NCezyHyd9YLkd2Xx+c2iDWQMGvpdVhVmeJ3ITbU2I5bLBAT6MrN01
> CnZ0+hYp8ZMCMshfDMFW260nJ6ijVsPBX4LFsSftsNYPitAD4lMNJ73oikXSjHyW
> B/9C1tbCVTWaS3CMhBPUfWGQGKbFDKtt4jkj64KGkqEMRrnH0KXnfwCK0VDL0XBi
> WGCvgYHO8N0iqdbge5xDUrfCHTvUv18U8xWaDkzk9Mqp52Idui2DpDEasCCAEUpV
> EAICDV8tGQZivGoQmQP6K8Pp/05xrm8kDv1xZWjG6wdO5g71aY0KMZqryoJAc68W
> aXfKfgvokcjQqteQNc+uLPc03WBob5dnwMJqOUQiMIjnKuFRvzoGumm3zQGlZI50
> 4W0gI9PRLNl4jQJxbGYF2Iv398pMmsbLdC37cx4D5HvHecPlcH5LD0l/Yt/zplar
> yJiN6gubLtbuSCU0TF3th+7HycAgSJYrW2KzuNWl0QTJwfLJkH+kfbVY7gTB7gkA
> ZXlUW/Cyzv58A6W5SxjF6OiRmTsmxvP2SWpO1+9uU4gosYJn8qQ7gcHVYTqEjtBH
> 4XdvdFwDuNISK8IGuqGXOFlbnlTRBmvCYCooAvt+vmj0zl55tzUXhmpOVImY2JKf
> yQns38JEmSM/dTdlR5zJrcrCUFiSNghGSwLTAFwbQfGRU2P4emZYQ2BMxo4NfF2f
> XLfynU3muDjG6DhI/ha9JovovXEwT7B1tckoAP2Ns0KO3V8CPBC3tOtZhQETjiuK
> 1Psu3NE=
> =ENte
> -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
>
> > let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
> > successfully encrypts a message to my key.
>
> That’s a serious sweetener. So I assume that I have misunderstood
> something about this challenge.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



-- 
GPG: http://is.gd/droope <http://is.gd/signature_>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/