Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic]
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:48:05 -0500
The former requiring too much effort
I'm not sure I agree with this statement. When Sony pissed off folks over the Playstation, countless hours were spent on the breaks and breach. Confer: http://thehackernews.com/2012/10/sony-playstation-3-hacked-with-custom.html and http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/ingame/hackers-stole-personal-data-playstation-network-123618. It does not hurt that Sony chronically drives drunk on the information superhighway. Confer: http://attrition.org/security/rants/sony_aka_sownage.html. Don't under estimate an attackers will or resolve. Jeff On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Daniel Corbe <corbe () corbe net> wrote:
That would require that you have sufficient access to create pseudo-eth devices in the first place. A vector of attack which requires previous privilege escalation or which is carried out by an individual in a position of trust is wholly uninteresting. The former requiring too much effort and the latter requiring a reexamination of your interpersonal relationships. -Daniel Daniel Preussker <daniel () preussker net> writes:Hi, I was looking into the net/core/dev.c from the current Kernel (previous also have this) and found out that ifIndex gets incremented by an endless loop. After creating 4 billion pseudo-eth devices I finally got it to overflow and endless loop, had to kill the kernel - fun right? General question, is this known? Daniel Preussker [ Security Consultant, Network & Protocol Security and Cryptography [ LPI & Novell Certified Linux Engineer and Researcher [ +49 178 600 96 30 [ Daniel () Preussker Net [ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x87E736968E490AA1
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Preussker (Feb 08)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Corbe (Feb 10)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Jeffrey Walton (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Preussker (Feb 11)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Jeffrey Walton (Feb 10)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Daniel Corbe (Feb 10)
- Re: ifIndex overflow (Linux Kernel - net/core/dev.c) [maybe offtopic] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)