Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting
From: Madhur Ahuja <ahuja.madhur () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 06:48:56 +0530
I havn't sent this email without doing a Proof of concept. It actually works with *Google Update Service*. The restricted user can replace GoogleUpdate.exe to execute malicious code. This service is installed by any of Google component such as Picasa, Google Talk etc. http://www.google.com/support/installer/bin/answer.py?answer=98805 Madhur On Monday, September 26, 2011, GloW - XD wrote:
Haha , too good and too true thor ! Maybe he can trick the user into installing on a FAT32 partition first, and THEN get the to execute from a remote share! Rofl x10. Agreed , this kind of attack, is NOT deasible in 2011, try maybe, 2006. Anyhow it has been a pleasure, ending this BS i think once and for all, lookup how winlogon works for one thing, then look at how windows creates and maintains a service_table, and then at the dlls, wich are protected ofc, you cannot touch msgina.dll,without ALOT of help from a rootkit or something similar, in wich case, why would you need to ? You could add an admin, hidden, and in simple batfile script (yes i do have my own code but no it is not for kids..), this is 10seconds and hidden, so when you have gotten that far, why would you bother to hijack a dll ? You CANNOT do crap,without complete ADMIN not SYSTEm, ADMIN$ share, and total axcs to all sockets, meaning, all pipe control and thats where half of windows exchanges smb shares for one thing, you guys dont seem to know CRAP about windows to start with, then have the gall to raise such a frigging ridiculous topic about a non happening, YOUTUBE ONE 'real' event, of this being useful, or, even just working, and i would look but, you wont, cannot, and will never be able to, especially on newer systems of windows7-8. As i said earlier, enjoy your bs DFLL hijacking, but ms, dont care for it, and whatever patches they instilled, dont touch even service_table.. so, they have not given it a high prio,and why shuld they. This is simply a case of a secteam gaining notoriety, to try and make this a 'big bug!!' , to try and gain brownie points from MS. Even tho, i dont believe in many things MS, I know windows system, and how to break it, better than many people, and i can tell you now, this whole DLL hijack, is a complete and utter waste of your times. But... keep on going, maybe MS will send you another 'thankyou' email ;) xd / crazycoders.com / #haxnet@Ef On 26 September 2011 10:52, Thor (Hammer of God) <thor () hammerofgod com>wrote: Maybe he can trick the user into installing on a FAT32 partition first, and THEN get the to execute from a remote share! On Sep 25, 2011, at 5:30 PM, "Travis Biehn" <tbiehn () gmail com> wrote: It might be a fun experiment to see what DLLs they're looking for :.) -Travis On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, <kz20fl () googlemail com> wrote: To replace a service executable you usually need administrator access anyway. ------Original Message------ From: Madhur Ahuja Sender: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk To: security-basics () securityfocus com To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: [Full-disclosure] Privilege escalation on Windows using BinaryPlanting Sent: 25 Sep 2011 19:31 Imagine a situation where I have a Windows system with the restricted user access and want to get the Administrator access. There are many services in Windows which run with SYSTEM account. If there exists even one such service whose executable is not protected by Windows File Protection, isn't it possible to execute malicious code (such as gaining Administrator access) simply by replacing the service executable with malicious one and then restarting the service. As a restricted user, what's stopping me to do this ? Is there any integrity check performed by services.msc or service itself before executing with SYSTEM account ? Madhur _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: <http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <http://secunia.com/>http://secunia.com/ Sent from my POS BlackBerry wireless device, which may wipe itself at any moment _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: <http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - <http://secunia.com/>http://secunia.com/ -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn>| GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | <http://www.travisbiehn.com> TravisBiehn.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: <http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Madhur Ahuja (Sep 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Madhur Ahuja (Sep 25)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Steve Syfuhs (Sep 27)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Gary Slavin (Sep 27)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Steve Syfuhs (Sep 27)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Madhur Ahuja (Sep 25)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting GloW - XD (Sep 25)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting Madhur Ahuja (Sep 25)
- Re: Privilege escalation on Windows using Binary Planting GloW - XD (Sep 25)