Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?
From: Andrew Farmer <andfarm () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:41:08 -0700
On 2011-10-04, at 02:43, Darren Martyn wrote:
Is there actually a non backdoored variant of said code? I have not seen any CVE mentioning that exploit so I was naturally wondering.
You are assuming that there is some substance to the code *besides* being a trojan/backdoor. Your assumption is mistaken -- there's no substance to it at all. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?, (continued)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? halfdog (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Kai (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Andrew Farmer (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? xD 0x41 (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? halfdog (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? halfdog (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Andrew Farmer (Oct 04)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? GloW - XD (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? GloW - XD (Oct 03)
- Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit? Laurelai (Oct 03)