Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Client aproach


From: Miguel Lopes <theoverblue () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:19:01 +0000

It was my first thought letting them know in anon e-mail but getting some extra cash would be great too.
I guess i will stick with sending the e-mail alerting them of the situation.

thanks

A 2011/12/01, às 16:55, Thor (Hammer of God) escreveu:

You are in a tough spot.   In general, the level of access you granted yourself in an unauthorized testing of the 
site would be considered illegal.  You may recall the whole 'or 1=1 thing.   So your approach to the client is all he 
would need to contact authorities if he so chose.  

Arguably, the best thing to do here would be to contact the owner and just give them the information for free, and do 
so in a way that does not implicate you in any wrongdoing.  Or simply drop it.  Moving forward, you might want to 
consider changing your business model so that you are hired to perform web app assessments before you start breaking 
laws.  

t

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of 
Miguel Lopes
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:56 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Client aproach

Hi List,

I found some major design flaws and vulnerabilities on a local webstore, but now i would like to tell the owner 
nicely and maybe profit from it?!
Does anyone have some tips on how to inform a potential client of their vulnerabilities?

Thanks in advance,
Miguel Lopes
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: