Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: iPhone Geolocation storage
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:21:33 +0200
The *real* problem is if you're in a jurisdiction like Michigan, which seems to think it's OK to hoover all the data out of electronic devices at a traffic stop.
Regardless of whether they are given access or not, the major concern isn't that, but rather whether they *can* or *can't*. Subpoena or not, they *can* get to the server - and everyone knows this. On the other hand, having a browser, devise or anything keep logs away from prying eyes, is a completely different problem altogether. Personally, I'd rather everyone that keeps a log also warns people about it (like how CCTV should be), than hassling over whether police should be given personal info or not (not saying the latter is unimportant). As they say, knowledge is power. Knowing what someone knows / could know about you doubles the points.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage, (continued)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Michael Holstein (Apr 21)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Brandon Matthews (Apr 21)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage mark seiden (Apr 21)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Ivan . (Apr 26)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Ivan . (Apr 26)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage nix (Apr 27)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Ivan . (Apr 27)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Ivan . (Apr 28)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Christian Sciberras (Apr 28)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 29)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Christian Sciberras (Apr 29)
- Re: iPhone Geolocation storage Jeffrey Walton (Apr 21)