Fwd: Congratulations Andrew

[n3ptun3 () london com]

 http://sites.google.com/site/n3td3v/

 


 "I watch people  who pose a risk or act a bit weird, and may have a mental illness. Some  of them are unpredictable 
and will do or say anything for attention or a  cause."

Naturally.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Thor (Hammer of God) <Thor () hammerofgod com>
To: wilder_jeff Wilder <wilder_jeff () msn com>; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk <full-disclosure () lists grok 
org uk>
Sent: Wed, Jun 16, 2010 7:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Congratulations Andrew



By the same logic, then yes you would.  Which is why the statement “if a system has no password, then you have a legal 
right to whatever data is on it” is complete horse hockey.  
 
Don’t take technical advice from your lawyer, and don’t take legal advice from people on security lists.
 
t
 


From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of 
wilder_jeff Wilder
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:56 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Congratulations Andrew

 

By that same standard.. if you leave your house unlocked.... does that give someone the right to enter it?

just my thoughts


Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:58:27 +0200
From: uuf6429 () gmail com
To: tbiehn () gmail com
CC: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk; Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Congratulations Andrew

Reminds be of Al Capone and tax evasion ;-)

Good ol' America.





On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM, T Biehn <tbiehn () gmail com> wrote:
Yes.
The FBI was investigating the AT&T incident, presumably the AT&T incident was what the fed were serving against.
What possible valid search warrant could be executed? There was no hack, breach, illegal access of data, or anything 
else for that matter.

If you leave a system online with no password which allows you to scrape content you have a legal right to scrape that 
content.

-Travis

 

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:09:22 EDT, T Biehn said:

> I doubt the search warrant will hold up in court.

Do you have any actual basis for saying that?  Sure, the warrant might be
bullshit, it might be solid - the article doesn't give us enough info either
way to tell.

"Auernheimer was also arrested in March for giving a false name to law
enforcement officers responding to a parking complaint."

Sad.  The dude may have the intelligence to pull the hack, but not have the
wisdom to not dig a hole deeper. Just man up and take the frikking parking
ticket. ;)






-- 
FD1D E574 6CAB 2FAF 2921  F22E B8B7 9D0D 99FF A73C
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=tbiehn&op=index&fingerprint=on
http://pastebin.com/f6fd606da


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

 


The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started.

=
 
_______________________________________________

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.

Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html

Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/