Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street
From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists () tx rr com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:56:55 -0600
--On November 5, 2009 10:03:31 PM -0600 Chris <r0ck () operamail com> wrote:
Sure, because we all know those rat bastards at the NSA and all those federal judges don't give a shit about the USA or freedom or personal rights.What do you say to the 99.99% approval rate? Are the FBI and other enforcement agencies just that good or is there a rubber stamp at work here?
Not being privy to the process, I couldn't even say if the approval process is that high. I'm not inclined to believe it simply because some reporter or secret source claimed it to be true. You, of course, live with the absolute certainty that you know the truth and no other possible explanation is plausible than the one you believe. I think this subject matter is far too complex for you to understand. You require simple explanations for everything. The government is always and wholly evil. People who reveal secrets that they've sworn not to reveal always tell the truth. Etc., etc.
When you forget that the people who work in government are just like you, trying to make a living and do the best they can, it's easy to depersonalize them and demonize them as if they're all blackhearted evil turds. Easy, that is, if you don't have much of a brain.What an idealistic view. How quant. I suppose you believe in truth, justice, and the American way as well. This is 2009. Wake up, Paul. The government is about one thing -- staying in existence. Given your stance on other topics, I'm surprised you don't realize this.
Human nature doesn't change when you get hired by the government. Motives will be the same as they are in every other field of endeavor. Or do you seriously believe that as soon as one receives their first payroll check from Uncle Sam that they immediately become part and parcel of the evil empire? BTW, it isn't the government that is about staying in existence so much as it is the politicians. Change that, and you can change the government. Or is that to hard a concept to follow?
Wow. How did you pull that fact out of your ass? Nobody mentioned violating their oaths of office...except you. more diversionary bullshit.
Math wasn't your long suit, huh? Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ****************************************** WARNING: Check the headers before replying _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street, (continued)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Rohit Patnaik (Nov 06)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 06)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Rohit Patnaik (Nov 06)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 06)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Rohit Patnaik (Nov 07)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 07)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 07)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 07)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 06)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 08)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Glenn.Everhart (Nov 09)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Paul Schmehl (Nov 09)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Glenn.Everhart (Nov 10)
- Message not available
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street dramacrat (Nov 09)
- Re: How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street Glenn.Everhart (Nov 10)