Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why are you against n3td3v?
From: andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace () rocketmail com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:14:36 +0000
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:54 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:09:58 GMT, you said:I'm not a troll and only serious researchers are subscribed to the n3td3v mailing list group.What does the following read like? A serious researcher? Or a troll/idiot?
You're doing yourself no good Valdis calling me an idiot you will only lose your own resolve.
--- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around? Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:40:54 +0000 To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Vord from the in-famous script kiddie channel #hackphreak!! omg, thats the biggest no credibility lamer channel ever. Its channels like #hackphreak which give IRC a bad name, the exact reason this thread started probably!! Vord, go back to #hackphreak kiddo. --- Oh, and if you can't remember, it was From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com>
There is nothing there that anyone with a clue would disagree with.
I have and I see me saying things that people thought I was saying to get a reaction when they are actually real things that are going on and my actual opinion on things.Unfortunately for your reputation, that's quite close to "No, I'm not a troll, I really had such stupid opinions on things".From there, it's just a short jump to "He's consistently clueless on *this*list - if he actually *has* 4500 people on another list, he's either equally clueless there and people read it for the humor value, or he's actually intelligent there - in which case he's a troll playing an idiot here".
I'm not clueless on this list everything I say is pretty accurate. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v?, (continued)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? j-f sentier (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? j-f sentier (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? j-f sentier (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? j-f sentier (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? andrew . wallace (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? Biz Marqee (Jan 11)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? Jan G.B. (Jan 14)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? vulcanius (Jan 14)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? vulcanius (Jan 14)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? vulcanius (Jan 15)
- Re: Why are you against n3td3v? j-f sentier (Jan 11)