Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits
From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:17:21 -0300
Dear n3td3v, the person =) I really appreciate your left wing point of view but you need to understand one thing: FD's a free list and all but it's not a blog. Nothing personal, On 5/17/08, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:38 PM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> > Date: Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM > Subject: Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits > To: nanog () merit edu > > > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian > <ops.lists () gmail com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft >> <mmc () internode com au> wrote: >>> If the way of running this isn't out in the wild and it's actually >>> dangerous then a pox on anyone who releases it, especially to gain >>> publicity at the expensive of network operators sleep and well being. >>> May you never find a reliable route ever again. >> >> This needs fixing. It doesnt need publicity at security conferences >> till after cisco gets presented this stuff first and asked to release >> an emergency patch. > > Agreed, > > You've got to remember though that a security conference is a > commercial venture, it makes business sense for this to be publically > announced at this security conference. > > I think security conferences have become something that sucks as its > all become money making oriented and the people who run these things > don't really have security in mind, just the £ signs reflecting on > their eye balls. > >> --srs >> -- >> Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com) >> > > All the best, > > n3td3v > Full-Disclosure, I fully believe British Intelligence are the best in the world and that they will pull the plug on this presentation without hesitation before it gets to go ahead. I don't see anyone disagreeing how wrong it is for this presentation to go ahead as a business decision. I know the national security boys at MI5 are listening, so I suggest this gets priority and this presentation doesn't go ahead. What I want is a high profile pulling the plug of this presentation to act as a deterrent to any other security conferences across the world who think they are going to capitalise through high risk vulnerabilities as this one is. I want UK government officials to walk on stage as this presnetation is about to start, infront of the media, infront of everybody, including the money makers who thought they were going to use this presentation as a way to sell tickets and make money and put UK national security at risk. I don't want a behind the scenes pulling the plug of this presentation, I want it to be high profile, infront of the worlds media to show that in Britian we don't fuck about with crappy security conferences trying to become rich by getting high risk talkers to come to their security conference to guarantee a sell out and thousands of pounds made, at a cost to UK national security. I will be talking with my private contacts to try and get this to happen, as many of you know I already had a grudge with EUSecWest spamming the mailing lists, instead of buying advertisement banners on websites, so the announcement of a IOS rootkit presentation is the final insult to injury, and the UK national security boys are likely to pull the plug on this without hesitation to make an example to these security conference owners to say that national security becomes before profit and how dare you try to profit and not giving a shit about the consequences of this presentation. Trust me and mark my words EUSecWest, you upset a lot of people spamming the mailing lists, this is just the worst possible thing you could have done to keep people on side, you've lost any respect I may have had for your conference and I guarantee UK government officials will pull the plug on your business venture of a security conference. Blackhat conference with Michael Lynn was under the control of the American authorities and they were light weight in response to what was going on, trust me, the British authorities will be coming down a lot tougher and won't be thinking twice about pulling this presentation, but will do it on a grand scale infront of the media, to send a clear signal that these security conferences and their money making agenda isn't going to get in the way of our national security. This is a subject I feel strongly and passionate about because if this presentation went ahead it would fuck up a lot of ISPs and would put national security at risk. If the British authorites don't pull the plug on this presentation you will have let your country down and let your British taxpayers down who fund MI5 in the first place. And its not just me saying this, ISPs are calling for this presentation to be pulled as well. All the best, n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- Marcio Barbado, Jr. "In fact, companies that innovate on top of open standards are advantaged because resources are freed up for higher-value work and because market opportunities expand as the standards proliferate." Scott Handy Vice President Worldwide Linux and Open Source, IBM _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Fwd: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 17)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 17)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Kurt Dillard (May 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Kurt Dillard (May 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] [OT] IOS rootkits php0t (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Elazar Broad (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits I M (May 18)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Valdis . Kletnieks (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Dr. J Swift (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Valdis . Kletnieks (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits Dr. J Swift (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] IOS rootkits n3td3v (May 20)