Re: Fwd: FD culture!?

[vulcanius <vulcanius () gmail com>]

It's pretty hilarious that you went and asked John to moderate those who
don't like you n3td3v and then turned around and criticized people for
wanting the same thing, except on a more unbiased level. I'm pretty positive
Cartwright doesn't give a shit about the quality of the list as I'm guessing
he unsubbed himself a looong time ago.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:30 AM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam () gmail com>
> wrote:
> > On 12/7/08, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
> > > What's John Cartwright got to do with an unmoderated mailing list? You
> > > joined F-D because you thought it would be partially moderated when
> > > someone *you~* don't agree with annoys you? lolcopter. You know where
> > > the unsubscribe button is if you don't like this style of mailing list
> > > management, please use it instead of moaning. On a side note, I
> > > already asked for Ureleet to be banned, but Cartwright's not
> > > interested in partially moderating an unmoderated mailing list. Would
> > > you rather the list was partially moderated?
> >
> > No... but least, less noise! We have two eyes, two ears but one mouth
> > for a reason. Listen more, look more but talk less.
> >
> > I am complaining because whats happening in FD contradicts to;
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Acceptable Content
> >
> > Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities is acceptable, for
> > instance announcement and discussion thereof, exploit techniques and
> > code, related tools and papers, and other useful information.
> >
> > Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is
> > forbidden. Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion
> > should be taken off-list wherever possible.
> >
> > Humour is acceptable in moderation, providing it is inoffensive.
> > Politics should be avoided at all costs.
> >
> > Members are reminded that due to the open nature of the list, they
> > should use discretion in executing any tools or code distributed via
> > this list.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Lastly, i request you all to only post things that we-all may find
> > interesting to read. Personal replies are better taken off-list.
> > Please keep noise low.
> >
> > Please help us to like you more!
>
> The charter is just a guideline, its got no law or authority.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/