Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Squashing supposed hacker profiling
From: "J. Oquendo" <sil () infiltrated net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:16:15 -0400
All female authors... Your so called gender guessing mechanism is flawed either way you want to cut it. You could try fuzzy math based on theories to profile anyone on this list, but unless you have feasible and PROVEN without reasonable doubt, its all a guessing game bottom line. Anyhow back to security, sociolinguistics is not meant for this list.
According to Dr. Krawetz's Gender Guesser... (http://www.hackerfactor.com/GenderGuesser.html#Analyze)
http://girlygeekdom.blogspot.com/ Genre: Informal Female = 104 Male = 602 Difference = 498; 85.26% Verdict: MALE Genre: Formal Female = 116 Male = 239 Difference = 123; 67.32% Verdict: MALE REALITY: WRONG http://www.darkreading.com/blog.asp?blog_sectionid=342&WT.svl=blogger1_5 Genre: Informal Female = 442 Male = 555 Difference = 113; 55.66% Verdict: Weak MALE Genre: Formal Female = 364 Male = 570 Difference = 206; 61.02% Verdict: MALE REALITY: WRONG http://invisiblethings.org/papers/joanna-talk_description-CCC04.txt Genre: Informal Female = 218v Male = 1186 Difference = 968; 84.47% Verdict: MALE Genre: Formal Female = 414 Male = 576 Difference = 162; 58.18% Verdict: Weak MALE REALITY: WRONGhttp://www.techsploitation.com/2007/05/31/what-the-hell-was-i-thinking-about-green-libertarians/ (text by Sue Lange)
Genre: Informal Female = 210 Male = 481 Difference = 271; 69.6% Verdict: MALE Genre: Formal Female = 260 Male = 408 Difference = 148; 61.07% Verdict: MALE REALITY: WRONG http://thelizardqueen.wordpress.com/2005/06/08/a-thoroughly-and-utterly-girly-blog-post-sorry-4/ Genre: Informal Female = 415 Male = 559 Difference = 144; 57.39% Verdict: Weak MALE Genre: Formal Female = 180 Male = 312 Difference = 132; 63.41% Verdict: MALE REALITY: WRONGTo be fair I had to go to the most feminine place I could think of, even then it was iffy.
http://groups.ivillage.com/motherdaughter/ Genre: Informal Female = 226 Male = 337 Difference = 111; 59.85% Verdict: Weak MALE Genre: Formal Female = 326 Male = 314 Difference = -12; 49.06% Verdict: Weak FEMALE REALITY: MAYBE THE AUTHOR HERE WAS FLAMINGLY GAY -- ==================================================== J. Oquendo http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743echo infiltrated.net|sed 's/^/sil@/g'
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." -- Plato
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? coderman (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? Michael Silk (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? StaticRez (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? Sam (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? scott (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? J. Oquendo (Jun 19)
- Squashing supposed hacker profiling J. Oquendo (Jun 19)
- Re: Squashing supposed hacker profiling Steven Adair (Jun 19)
- Re: Squashing supposed hacker profiling J. Oquendo (Jun 19)
- Re: Squashing supposed hacker profiling Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? Michael Silk (Jun 18)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? Dr. Neal Krawetz PhD (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? jt5944-27a (Jun 19)
- Re: Dear Neal Krawetz, will the real n3td3v please stand up? jt5944-27a (Jun 19)