Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Captive Portal bypassing
From: Peter Besenbruch <prb () lava net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:29:49 -1000
Of course you might want to keep the legal aspects in mind before doing any of that.
On Monday 10 December 2007 12:04:05 gmaggro wrote:
Bah. Who cares about that. Our governments have proven they do not respect the rule of law; why should we?
Because what you espouse would result in general lawlessness, a situation that is worse for the common good than what we have now. More specifically, the impact on captive portals would be an escalating arms race between the portals in question, and the purveyors of the software you envision. The end result would be either a locked down portal, or a closed down portal. More effective in opening up WiFi access in places like airports will be a dawning recognition by communities that open access provides a community a business advantage. -- Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing T Biehn (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing Steven Adair (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing Peter Besenbruch (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing coderman (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 11)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing coderman (Dec 11)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing coderman (Dec 11)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)