Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:30:20 +0300
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:41:04PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
way he sees fit. I gave this issue CVE-2006-4811. Typically, when someone reports a security issue to a group such as vendor-sec, it is quickly given a CVE id before analysis is complete so there is no confusion. It's not
just to clarify: i didn't post to vendor-sec for a number of reasons. the bug was forwarded to them. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Pink Hat (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Josh Bressers (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 14)