Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier

From: "Pink Hat" <pinkhat.h4x0r () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:20:00 -0700

On 10/13/06, Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:11:24PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:


Use CVE-<F*CK> for this issue.


the redhat persons means for THIS:
(the png is well formed, but the redhat person wasn't elligible to know it.)


-------------------
<html><head>
<!--
Copyright Georgi Guninski
may not be used in vulnerability databases - like mitre/symantec


So are you ever going to work up the balls to actually test of your
silly little copyright is enforceable?

This is the equivalent of the idiotic email disclaimers people use.
In fact, I am going to take every piece of code you have published in
a public forum and republish it somewhere else and make a profit from
it.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread:

Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Pink Hat (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Josh Bressers (Oct 13)
  - Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 14)