Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft
From: endrazine <endrazine () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:43:37 +0100
Hi, David Litchfield a écrit :
Hey all, What started out as a fun project for me turned out some serious results - "Which is more secure? Oracle vs Microsoft" is a paper I put together looking at the number of security flaws in the Oracle and MS database offerings. For those that are interested, you can grab a copy of the results here: http://www.databasesecurity.com/dbsec/comparison.pdf Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
No offense David, but those two products don't serve the same purpose : you just can't use MS Sql for big databases. It's a bit like asking "which is more secure : Oracle or gcc" ? What's the point ? How can this be relevant ?? Cheers, endrazine- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft David Litchfield (Nov 20)
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft endrazine (Nov 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft David Kierznowski (Nov 21)
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft David Litchfield (Nov 21)
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft Alexander Kornbrust (Nov 21)
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft David Litchfield (Nov 21)
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft Alexander Kornbrust (Nov 21)
- Re: Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft David Litchfield (Nov 21)