Re: Re: Question about Mac OS X 10.4 Security

[Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>]

--On Thursday, March 02, 2006 09:42:47 +1100 mz4ph0d () gmail com wrote:

> At 4:20 PM -0600 1/3/06, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> > So, Apple hasn't fully addressed this problem yet.  (Trust me, I've
> > tested it.)
> > If you are responsible for Macs and you haven't read this yet, you need
> > to:
>
> Safari and Mail. Sure, agreed, but they do move quickly to fix problems
> publicly known, and I'm very confident that they'll shortly also release
> a fix for the filetype/app problem (what could be considered the main
> problem I guess).
I suspect it will take a while.  The underlying problem has to do with how 
metadata in files is parsed by the OS.  Fixing that will likely take some 
serious brainwork, perhaps even a rewrite of some parts of the OS.  I don't 
think they'll be fixing it any time soon, although they may come up with 
some intermediate measures that lessen the exposure.

> Apple actually *do* tend to position security over functionality, unlike
> Microsoft (do?/has?), when the way something that was introduced as
> a feature is shown to be insecure, they change it to make it more
> secure, rather than saying "It's what our users want! It's a feature,
> not a bug."
I could care less about that.  Every vendor has their good points and their 
faults.  What I want is a vendor who recognizes when they've done something 
stupid, admits it and fixes it - permanently.

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/