Re: Industry calls on Microsoft to scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws

["MR BABS" <mrbabs () gmail com>]

You can not possibly understand the extent of n3td3v's absolute powers.
N3td3v is infallible. Tom Cruise is, in fact, a member. The infosec
community is just one big lol after the last.

On 3/26/06, GroundZero Security <fd () g-0 org> wrote:
>  first you say:
> "One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually people
> from MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already"
> or:
> "*the n3td3v group is the biggest thing you'll ever meet in your life
> time"*
> then later:
> "..as the big players get it so badly wrong infront of the international
> stage"
>
> isnt that conflicting ? first you pretend that you (and your imaginary
> group) would be the biggest shit out there,
> but then you refer to SANS as the big players while you first braged that
> your imaginary people work for MS etc.
> try to keep your story straight....
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com>
> *To:* full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 26, 2006 5:46 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to
> scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws
>
> Wow, hence the ideals of being an anonymous group. Like if names were put
> to list, they wouldn't be sacked straight away... Wake up, smell the
> postitives of being anonymous for five minutes, or maybe that leaves you,
> CERT, SANS a bit head rubbed, just like SANS once said FIREFOX posed a
> lesser threat that IE. OH, the guys I speak to at MS were chuckling about
> that one. Of course SANS reversed their claim that FIREFOX was less
> vulnerable than IE later, much later. The credibility of SANS, of course
> comes into questions, while folks at n3td3v c onsortium laugh with glee,
> as the big players get it so badly wrong infront of the international stage.
>
> On 3/26/06, William Lefkovics <william () lefkovics net> wrote:
> > Not to mention the absence of legitimate names of the folks.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Mike
> > Hoye
> > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:08 PM
> > To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap
> > PatchTuesday for Critical flaws
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:39:32AM +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> > > One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually people
> > > from MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already.
> >
> > You know, legitimate groups don't have to keep claiming, over and over,
> > that
> > they're legit.
> >
> > It's remarkable how that works.
> >
> > --
> > "Totally mad. Utter nonsense. But we'll do it because it's brilliant
> > nonsense." - Douglas Adams
> >
> > _______________
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/