Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: FD Charter


From: morla <morla () cracksucht de>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:27:37 +0200

i agree with stacksmasher...
please setup a filter in  ur mail client if it rocks you....

m0rla

-- choooOOooooochoooOOOOOOooOOOOOOooooO

Stack Smasher wrote:
Dude, Go fuck yourself! If you don't like this list then don't
subscribe, simple as that. I think most people on this list believe
that censorship in any form is wrong whether you agree with what
people say or not. And to say that someones E-Mail message is "libel"
just shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, we own
the interweb, we create the laws and no one will ever stop us. That's
why this list is called "FULL DISCLOSURE" not Matt Burnett's fucking
whine blog about everything that is sad in my life.........

Stacksmasher


On 8/2/06, Matt Burnett <marukka () mac com> wrote:
The charter says the list is supposed to be "self-policing". How do
we take action against offending members, short of a d0s? The charter
also says that management can remove members for "spamming" or
"misappropriation". Have anyone from management read any of n3td3v's
posts? Am i the only on who considers n3td3v's posts to libel?
Couldnt his/her advertising his/her own list be considered spam. I
really want to know how a group can be self-policing if they have no
ability to take action?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: